Skip to main content
Category

CIVIL MATTERS

TRADEMARK

By CIVIL MATTERS, TNo Comments

The registration of a trade mark may not in all cases provide a complete defence to an action for infringement of trade mark or passing off. The basis of the concept and principle of passing off action is that a man is not to sell his own goods under the pretense that they are the goods of another man. There is no reason why a registered owner of a trade mark should be allowed to deceive purchasers into the belief that they are getting the goods of another while they would be buying the goods of the former which they never intended to do.

Read More

TORT

By CIVIL MATTERS, TNo Comments

Negligence is said to be omission or failure to do something which a reasonable man, under similar circumstances, would do or doing of something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do. Put differently, negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate conduct of human affairs, would do or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.

Read More

TENANCY

By CIVIL MATTERS, TNo Comments

A customary tenancy involves the transfer of an interest in land from the customary landlord or overlord to the customary tenant, and which interest entitles the customary tenant to exclusive possession of the land and, subject to good behaviour, he holds in perpetuity. [Akinbade v. Babatunde (2018)7 NWLR (Pt. 1618) 366; Dashi v. Sat long (2009) 5NWLR (Pt. 1134) 281; Lasisi v. Tubi (1974) 12 SC 71; Ejeanalonye v. Omabuike (1974) 1 All NLR 295 referred to.] (Pp. 422-423, paras. H-B).

Read More

STARE DECISIS

By CIVIL MATTERS, SNo Comments

By the doctrine of stare decisis, every inferior court is bound by the decision of a superior court of record and must apply it, however sure it may be that it was wrongly decided. The place of precedent, the doctrine of stare decisis, in adjudication is an eminent one.

Read More

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

By CIVIL MATTERSNo Comments

Specific performance is a court-ordered remedy that requires precise fulfillment of a legal or contractual obligation when monetary damages are inappropriate or inadequate. Specific performance is an equitable remedy that lies within the court’s discretion to award whenever the common law remedy is insufficient either because the damages could be inadequate or because damages could not be possibly established. In essence, the remedy of specific performance enforces the execution of a contract according to its terms, and it may therefore be contrasted with the common law remedy of damages, which is compensation for non-execution of contracts. (Pp. 40-41, paras. H-B).

Read More

RECUSAL OF A JUDGE

By CIVIL MATTERS, RNo Comments

Recusal, with respect to judicial proceedings is the stepping aside or disqualification of a judicial officer from a case on the ground of personal interest in the matter, bias, prejudice, or conflict of interest, or if he has conducted himself in such a way that he could be regarded as having become, directly or indirectly, a party to the proceedings. (P. 234, paras. C-D).

Read More

RATIO DECENDI

By CIVIL MATTERS, RNo Comments

Ratio decidendi represents the reasoning or principle or ground upon which a case is decided. It means what was decided. It is not something which a party imagines or thinks was decided. The ratio decidendi of a case lays down the principle of law that has the binding force of precedent. It makes good sense that such peripheral expressions, i.e. obiter dicta, should not be allowed to becloud the substance of a court’s judgment.

Read More

POLITICAL PARTY

By CIVIL MATTERS, PNo Comments

A party is like a club. It has its own rules, regulation, guidelines, and constitution. Members join the party on their own free will. By joining, they freely give their consent to be bound by the rules, regulation, guidelines and constitution of the party. The rules of the party must be obeyed by all members of the party, as the party’s decision is final over its own affairs.

Read More

PRE-ELECTION

By CIVIL MATTERS, PNo Comments

By a combination of section 285(14)(a) of the1999 Constitution (as amended) and section 84 of the Electoral Act, pre-election matters such as a complaint from an aspirant at a political party’s primary election about the conduct of the primary election is justiciable. But where an issue between members of a political party borders on an alleged violation arising from the conduct of the political party’s congress to elect delegates or its officers, it would amount to the domestic affairs of the party which is not justiciable.

Read More